Just when we thought Harry and Meghan might stay out of the headlines for a while, they’ve decided to dive headfirst into the murky waters of American politics, and could this turn into a colossal mistake.

This time, it seems their Archewell Foundation might be skating dangerously close to violating IRS rules.

Harry and Meghan’s Archewell Foundation is under scrutiny for its recent encouragement of voter participation in the 2024 election, raising concerns about potential violations of IRS regulations. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, Archewell is prohibited from engaging in political campaigning, and their actions may jeopardize the foundation’s tax-exempt status.

The couple’s push for Americans to vote underscores their desire to remain relevant in public discourse, yet it may also attract unwanted attention from the IRS. Archewell’s mission focuses on charitable activities, and any political involvement could lead to serious consequences for both the organization and its founders.

This isn’t the first instance of Harry and Meghan engaging in American politics; their previous appeals during the 2020 election reveal a pattern that has sparked eyebrows and concern about compliance with tax regulations.

In light of their recent activities, experts suggest that the IRS could initiate an investigation into Archewell’s operations.

Commentary around this situation emphasizes a perceived misunderstanding by Harry and Meghan regarding American voting rights, noting that citizens have been exercising these rights independently for much longer than the couple has been in the public eye.

Additionally, the couple’s advocacy for democracy raises contradictions, especially as they continue to retain their royal titles, which some Americans find incongruous in political discussions.

With previous infractions hanging over them, the potential for serious legal repercussions looms larger, posing significant risks to both their public image and the future of the Archewell Foundation. As scrutiny intensifies, the couple must navigate the fine line between activism and compliance to avoid jeopardizing their nonprofit status.