Out went the understated chic; in came the Navajo Weaver dress by Colombian designer Johanna Ortiz. With its metallic-threaded Navajo pattern, blush pink panel, and burgundy details, the dress was certainly eye-catching. But it was the cutout bodice and a daring front slit that caught the most attention—and not necessarily in a good way. Meghan accessorized the ensemble with Lanvin earrings, a Cartier watch and bracelet, and Jimmy Choo shoes, letting her hair down in a nod to effortless glamor.

Meghan Markle’s fashion choices during her recent tour in Colombia have sparked considerable controversy, particularly regarding an outfit deemed inappropriate for a school visit.

The dress, featuring bold cutouts and a daring front slit by Colombian designer Joanna Ortiz, drew significant criticism from the Colombian Vice President and overshadowed the intended purpose of the visit.

The Vice President of Colombia expressed discontent with Meghan’s choice of attire, underscoring the importance of modesty in a predominantly Catholic country.

This criticism highlighted a cultural clash between royal fashion statements and local norms, reflecting a disconnect between Meghan’s wardrobe choices and the expectations for such diplomatic engagements.

The local press described Meghan’s outfit as an “absolute disaster,” emphasizing how cultural sensitivities can clash with high-profile fashion choices during public appearances.

This negative reaction further fueled the debate over whether Meghan’s fashion decisions were appropriate for the context of her visit.

Meghan’s fashion choices have frequently drawn attention, often for the wrong reasons. Critics argue that her attire can overshadow the diplomatic objectives of her engagements, raising concerns about whether her fashion decisions are more about personal publicity than respect for the visit’s purpose.

The Vice President’s regret over inviting Meghan reveals the tension created by her presence, suggesting that the visit may have been perceived as a platform for personal gain rather than a sincere diplomatic gesture.

Additionally, Meghan’s frequent outfit changes and the perceived impracticality of her fashion choices during events have been criticized for detracting from her engagement and respect for the schedule.

These issues raise questions about her priorities and effectiveness in her diplomatic role.