Rachel DeMita has taken the WNBA to task for not including Caitlin Clark on the MVP ladder, despite her standout rookie season.

Clark’s impressive statistics, including leading the league in points generated, have ignited debates about the MVP selection process and its apparent bias towards established players.

Clark’s exclusion from the MVP ladder is seen as a glaring oversight, especially given her dual-threat capabilities as both a scorer and playmaker.

DeMita argues that the criteria used for MVP consideration may not fully capture the value of Clark’s contributions.

This criticism underscores a broader issue with the current evaluation system, which may not adequately recognize exceptional talent.

Clark’s performance, including her notable synergy with teammates and statistical achievements, highlights a potential disconnect between individual excellence and MVP recognition.

The debate is further complicated by the subjective nature of MVP evaluations, which often favor established stars from top teams over emerging talents like Clark.

As the conversation continues, there is growing advocacy for a more equitable MVP selection process that considers the overall impact of players, regardless of their team’s standing.

The current system, which tends to overlook emerging talents, could undermine the sport’s growth and discourage future generations from pursuing basketball.