Candace Owens has once again stirred controversy with her outspoken views on transgender issues, specifically labeling gender transitions as a form of mental disorder. During a recent discussion, Owens drew comparisons between being transgender and conditions such as anorexia and body dysmorphia, arguing that society needs to approach these topics with a strong adherence to objective reality rather than emotion-driven narratives.

Owens began by challenging the notion that being transgender is not classified as a mental disorder. She asserted that the conversation around gender identity has strayed from factual understanding, which she believes is essential for fostering a more informed and inclusive society. Owens pointed out that public figures like herself are often caught in the crossfire of such debates, as they attempt to present their arguments based on facts rather than societal pressures or emotional appeals.

A key part of her argument was the distinction between mental disorders and identity expressions. Owens suggested that failing to recognize this distinction could lead to the dangerous blurring of lines between objective reality and personal beliefs, which could, in turn, complicate legal and societal frameworks. She emphasized the need to understand and acknowledge the disarray between mind and body that some individuals experience, as this is critical for fostering compassion and effective dialogue.

The discussion also touched on the historical evolution of mental health classifications, with Owens noting that societal views have shifted over time, as seen in the reclassification of homosexuality. She expressed concern about potential future changes in these classifications, referencing the controversial term “minor attracted people” as an example of how definitions could evolve in ways that challenge societal norms.

Owens further critiqued the inconsistencies in societal perceptions of identity, particularly when it comes to race. She questioned why the concept of transracialism—where a person identifies as a race different from the one they were born into—is not given the same acceptance as gender identity. She humorously suggested that strategic racial identification could be used to gain societal advantages, such as in school admissions, thereby highlighting how societal benefits can influence identity choices.

Throughout the discussion, Owens maintained that societal views on mental health and identity need to be grounded in objective reality to prevent the erosion of fundamental truths about human nature. She argued that while it is important to support individuals struggling with their identities, it is equally crucial to distinguish between mental health issues and identity expressions to ensure a more coherent and compassionate approach to these complex topics.

Owens’ views have predictably sparked debate, with many applauding her for speaking out against what they see as a growing trend of relativism in discussions about gender and identity. However, others have criticized her for what they perceive as a lack of sensitivity and understanding towards transgender individuals and the broader LGBTQ+ community. As society continues to grapple with these issues, the conversation that Owens has reignited underscores the ongoing tension between traditional views and evolving perspectives on identity and mental health.