When we think of Michael Jordan, we mostly think of his time with the Bulls and his domination of the NBA in the 90s. That’s where he wrote his legend.
But for Rasheed Wallace, the Wizards’ GM would have something extra and deserve more credit.
After a few weeks of well-deserved vacation, he will turn to his 22nd NBA season with the same ambition as usual.
At the same age, Michael Jordan was also preparing for a comeback, but not necessarily with the same enthusiasm.
He played for the Wizards, a franchise that was not very prestigious and certainly not destined to play for the title.
While he was still averaging 20 points, the No. 23 didn’t necessarily give off the same impression of ease on the court as the King does today.
Rasheed Wallace’s crazy opinion on Jordan
Rasheed Wallace, who had the chance to play against both versions of Michael Jordan, has just given a lunar opinion on the latter.
According to the 2004 champion, the Wizards’ GM was much more dangerous and fundamentally better than the GM who walked the league with Chicago. He spoke on his podcast:
Read also
“Bronny James is the only NBA player who can’t…
Michael Jordan was a phenomenal player in Chicago, but I think he was even more dangerous with the Wizards.
He didn’t have the athleticism he had in his younger years, but he moved much more precisely. He was a strong guard, so it was difficult for a defender to move him.
His shot was also more dangerous. He was more solid, you couldn’t leave him open at 3 points.
For Rasheed Wallace, Michael Jordan was a better basketball player with the Wizards.
For example, the former Pistons player found his shot more reliable and his movements more precise… Unfortunately, his argument doesn’t touch Internet users.
Okay, keep him away from the microphone 💀
Rasheed Wallace is sure of his words: Michael Jordan was a better basketball player in the 2000s with the Wizards, or at least a more complete one.
An opinion that is far from speaking to NBA fans.
